Archive for March, 2006

29 Martii 2006

Goth tribulations

We had to chase Didi down this morning to stuff her in the cat carrier to go to the vet to get her teeth cleaned. She gets real creative about hiding.

Dream is spared the unhappiness this time, but he gets some unhappiness all his very own in a couple of weeks. His heart murmur has gotten so bad that it’s really worrying the vets. We had him checked for hyperthyroidism, but that doesn’t seem to be the problem. So it’s an echocardiogram for him, and the less said about the expense, the better.

It could be nothing. Or it could be not-nothing, and in the latter case, I would appreciate any thoughts you can spare for a skinny little black cat who’s polite to everybody. We’re pretty heartsick ourselves.

28 Martii 2006

Starchless blogging

Walking the tightrope between personal and professional blogging can feel downright death-defying. It also complicates simple things, like “do I put my blog’s URL on my listing on a library-related website?”

It would be disingenuous of me—worse, dishonest—to claim that CavLec is wholly divorced from my professional life. Ninety percent of the librarians I know (whether I have met them in person or not), I know because of the blog. The converse also holds; any given librarian who knows me probably met me through the blog. So yes, I do find myself using its URL in informal professional contexts.

Still and all, CavLec won’t ever appear on my CV. It won’t go into The Binder I have to submit early next year to get my contract renewed (and you don’t even want to get me started on the topic of The Binder). I don’t mention it in the canned bios I give conferences and publications. I quite simply don’t want it considered as any part of my actual job. Ever.

I find that that’s where the to-blog-or-not-to-blog firewall is settling in. I talk about my profession on CavLec. I mostly don’t talk about my job, except insofar as I pursue my profession while doing my job. Lots of things have happened at MPOW that even the most faithful CavLec reader doesn’t know about. Sometimes this is a distinction without a difference, but all in all, it seems to be working out fine for everyone concerned. Because, really, who needs the skinny on our latest search committee or task force?

Keeping that firewall in place protects some freedoms that I value. One of them is the freedom to be silly, not to take myself seriously, not to take my work seriously, not to take the profession seriously. Not all the time, anyway. I don’t have to be all starchy and buttoned-down on CavLec. Just as well, because wearing starched shirts makes my skin itch, and producing starched writing makes my brain itch.

The Family Man Librarian got a mite annoyed with me and fellow CiL2006 bloggers for excessive adulation with a side of teenybopper absurdity. Well, I plead no contest. Going fangirly over colleagues is unquestionably silly and “unprofessional” (scare quotes because that’s a word I loathe). I refuse to admit, however, that silliness is unequivocally a bad thing, and as I’ve said before, I’ll fangirl where I please.

Hasn’t librarianship been starching its shirts long enough? Don’t we have enough of a reputation as stuffy naysayers? Shouldn’t we want to call attention to the best in our profession? And doesn’t humor get attention?

Sure, it’s possible to go overboard. The day I go on being silly about someone after that person asks me to stop—well, that’s just rude. The day I refuse to call one of my heroes out on something because s/he’s my hero, y’all just go ahead and shoot me like a worn-out horse. The day I turn pit-bull on somebody who disagrees with one of my heroes, ditto.

But I’ve no plans to stop being excited when I meet someone I admire. The best thing about this profession is the number of people in it or affiliated with it that I admire. And if I express my admiration in goofball terms, honestly, where’s the harm? Starch is for shirts, not blogs. Not this blog, anyway.

27 Martii 2006

Caminando

My first job was a summer gig at K&W Cafeteria in Cameron Village in Raleigh. (This was back before K&W moved to its current location and Cameron Village got all upscale. Yep, way back in the day.) I was hired to bus tables, but was quickly moved into the stockroom.

I worked where I did because it was one of the few centers of employment within walking distance of my parents’ house. And walk I did, every day, rain or shine or deathly heat, about a 25-minute haul each way at best pace.

I never went best-pace, though. Most of the way there stood an apartment complex in which lived a ratty shorthaired fleabitten old ginger tom who (once he decided I was cat people) was the nicest outside-cat I can ever remember. He would come running to see me, sprawl purring at my feet as long as I wanted to stay and pet him, and look after me mournfully when I had to leave him behind.

I don’t know whether he owned anybody. I think he did, though at first I didn’t; I bought him a flea collar and annoyed the life out of him putting it on him. After that he got to looking a bit more presentable, so maybe his people took the hint.

In Bloomington, where I went to college, nothing was really more than a 20-minute walk from campus, so I walked to everything. Walked to class, walked to work, walked to Li’s apartment way up northeast of campus, walked to the grocery store in the mall two or three times a semester when I needed laundry detergent or whatever. I used to annoy the heck out of one particular yellow-shafted flicker, walking by right when he wanted to drum on something. For some reason he didn’t want to drum when anyone could see him. Probably teenaged.

The Madison apartments I lived in were walking-distance to the parts of campus I typically needed to get to. So I walked. I walked to the grocery store, too, though I took the bus back because a week’s groceries was a bit much to tote. When we moved into our house, I perforce picked up a utility cart because there was no bus from the store to the house. The Madison house was in a golden spot for walking: groceries, hardware, and the farmer’s market twenty minutes’ walk in one direction, the public library twenty minutes’ walk in the other.

I didn’t really walk around here much, aside from popping down to the store once a week for groceries. Everything felt too far away to walk to. It bothered me subliminally. An area I don’t walk in isn’t an area that I feel I belong in.

So now I’ve started walking to or from work a couple of times a week. Everyone I’ve mentioned this to immediately does their best to wipe the “what are you, nuts?” look off their faces. Honestly, it’s not all that far; 45 minutes sees me door-to-door. About half the walk is an ugly haul down one of Fairfax’s main drags; the rest is a pleasant stroll through real neighborhoods (which, of course, are entirely out of the question for me—even so, they’re nice places to looky-loo) with a riot of birdcalls, plenty of mature trees, and yes, even the occasional outdoors ginger tom.

It helps. Fairfax is slowly starting to feel like a place I know.

Ruben Blades really says it all:

Con el tiempo comprendí
Que la vida da pa’ to’
Que nada borra el recuerdo
De lo que uno caminó…

Rolling with the punches

So there’s been a study that hints that the usual “open access increases citation impact!” line is subject to a chicken-and-egg problem. Examination of four math journals seems to have indicated not so much that open access increased citations, but that high-quality work by high-quality researchers is made open-access to begin with.

Quite a few people are questioning the study’s conclusions, not least because of an extremely small and specialized sample size. I’m not, except insofar as I just did. I want to do a little thought experiment instead. What if they’re right?

I hope I’m not the only repository-rat in existence to see an obvious and compelling new story to tell. “The best researchers are going OA—so you should too!” I like this story. It should play well. Researchers always have their eyes on their field’s hotshots.

Possibly because the open-access field is led by one or two dyed-in-the-wool dogmatists of the most rigidly dogmatic variety, we have gotten a little too attached to some of our stories. I’m still disturbed to have met a publisher of open-access journals who was upset at finding success through other roads than ideology. As long as they’re coming, who cares why? Especially because some of OA’s benefits to a journal are clearly structural; imitate as they may, no toll-access journal can reproduce them.

Word is that the authors of the study I cited at the beginning of this post have been asked to pull their punches because of potential damage to open access. Anyone making such a request should be ashamed of doing so. Examine the study, yes. Question its results, yes. Perform other studies in hopes of contradicting this one, yes. Suppress unfavorable research? No, no, a thousand times no!

Better we should learn to roll with the punches. Sometimes that isn’t even hard.

26 Martii 2006

We so rule

Final Four, baby! Final frickin’ Four!

The picture below comes from reference department head Jamie Coniglio, who forcibly bestickered and beribboned every GMU librarian at Computers in Libraries (yes, including me):

Decorated reference desk

GO PATRIOTS!

Shout-out to Ruritania

Oh, and while at Computers in Libraries I ran into the librarian who beat me out for the job at Ruritania. Said librarian, a CavLec reader, looked a little taken aback when I was open about the connection, but hey—it’s all good from where I’m sitting. Ruritania got a good one, I did fine, nobody needs to be embarrassed about anything.

I heard that Ruritania lost the wonderful gentleman who waited up all hours for me when my plane was late. I offer the Ruritania librarians my sincerest condolences. He was a good man and a good librarian; they’re not so thick on the ground that we can afford to lose one like him.

25 Martii 2006

Meeting the tribe

Librarians are my tribe. They think the way I do, work on the things I work on and care about, crack jokes I find funny, build an atmosphere I can get along in. It is a good thing to spend three days among them.

I mean, no conference can be bad in which I meet Emily Lynema, who did the actual rubber-meets-road work that made the NCSU catalog possible. (Conference organizers? I would pay large amounts of green for a conference session about how she did that. Obscene amounts. I might even travel.)

And as long as I’m engaging in shameless name-dropping, I met Roy Tennant and Michael Sauers and Meredith Farkas and Andrew Pace and Rea Davakos and Greg Schwartz and Rob Casson and Rachel Singer Gordon and lots of people. And it was fun!

Unfortunately, however, Computers in Libraries isn’t my conference. I don’t regret going, because it’ll be a while until I sort out which conferences are mine. This one, however, is clearly not. To a large extent, this conference is for people who need to be told to try new things, people who have to have their hands closed around a rock and moved up and down before they will actually beat on something with it. Beating things with rocks comes naturally to me. It’s just what I do.

It’s mostly for public-service folks, too. Which is great, and I don’t mean that as a put-down; it’s just that my patrons, my needs, my duties, and my strategies are different.

So I had a great time, and I’m not in the least sorry I went—but I probably won’t be back.

How to sell your company’s stuff at conferences

Back in the day, while I was working remotely for an ebook company, I was asked to go to a conference that was happening locally. Yay, I said, I love conferences!

“And go to the receptions and talk up the company. Tell them they really should be doing business with us, hand out cards. Give ’em the sell, you know?” With an over-familiar wink.

I felt so bad about that bald injunction that I didn’t go. And frankly, if I had gone, I wouldn’t have made a lick of difference, even if I had followed instructions to the letter.

I present you a paradox: The way to sell your company’s stuff at conferences, outside the exhibit hall, is not to sell your company’s stuff.

Lorcan Dempsey of OCLC and Paul Miller of Talis clearly know this. They showed off their companies’ stuff, yes. After framing and discussing at some length a problem of general interest to the conference audience without so much as mentioning their companies’ names. (In Lorcan’s case, he didn’t have to—but Talis is much younger and less ubiquitous than OCLC, yet Mr. Miller observed the same basic courtesy.)

Two other presenters, part of a thoroughly dismal panel (except for the last speaker, who tried his level best to make up for his predecessors’ wretched showing, and to his credit nearly succeeded) about digitization issues, took the more usual vendor conference-presenter route. Hi, I’m me, here’s my company, here’s some info about my company, here’s what my company does, here’s why my company’s cool, and oh yeah, here’s a tidbit or two about digitization.

Except by that time I bloody well wasn’t listening, because I know a commercial when I hear it. I don’t listen to commercials masquerading as conference sessions, nor do I leave with warm and fuzzy feelings about the perpetrators. Commercials on TV are bad enough, but necessary. Commercials in a conference session are insulting. I do not pay buckus maximus for a conference in order to listen to vendors inflate their chests.

Conferences are where a tribe gathers for its members to talk amongst themselves. If you paint yourself in a conference session as a vendor, you are setting yourself apart from the tribe. Explicitly. So don’t do it. The point of presenting at a conference if you are a vendor is to establish yourself as one of the tribe. I know a fair few librarians who are consistently peeved by OCLC, but I don’t know one who doesn’t respect Lorcan Dempsey. He’s one of the librarian tribe, and his presentation at Computers in Libraries only reaffirmed his membership. Does that help OCLC? You bet it does.

Take a baby step, vendors. You know that “About The Company” slide you put in all your conference presentations? Kill it. Shoot it, drown it, stomp it flat, ritually disembowel (or -vowel) it, whatever it takes. You are talking to a roomful of librarians. We’re good at finding stuff out. If you intrigue us, we will find out whatever you put on that slide. If you waste our time, we will loathe and avoid you, not to mention writing snide things about you on our blogs.

Conference organizers? Outlaw the above slide when you accept a vendor’s conference proposal. Let the vendor scream, but don’t give in. You’re only helping the vendor, even if the vendor is too bloody stupid to realize it.

I will say for Bill Kasdorf that he understood all this right down to his bone-marrow. In my opinion, which no one else is required to respect, Bill lost his company because he consistently made deeply stupid and counterproductive decisions that alienated many of his best people into leaving. But he knew how to sell at conferences, and he did it by not selling anything but his own enthusiasm. (Well, and by passing off his employees’ expertise as his own; see above about deeply stupid and alienating decisions.) I suspect Bill gave me as much rope as he did because he saw—not that I understood this, because I didn’t, but that in my naivete I behaved quite naturally in this fashion.

I leave you with a cautionary tale. At the first big ebook conference I went to, a major player in the industry scheduled a session about conversion techniques. Oh, cool, conversion-peasant talk! I was there with bells on—only to find a canned-narration twenty-minute PowerPoint, solid commercial-talk from one end to the other, instead of a real person talking about text artisanry!

The vendor in question was the first to go down in flames.

23 Martii 2006

True to form

I usually start running out of steam during the second afternoon of a three-day conference. I’m completely true to form on this one.

Turns out I left one thing out of yesterday’s catalogue of derelictions: I completely spaced on a meeting set up with me for CiL weeks ago. Bad me. Bad!

But I got to Lorcan Dempsey’s talk this morning, and he came down, saw my nametag, and shook hands with me, so I’m all fangirly and stuff. (I refuse to feel silly about being a Lorcan Dempsey fangirl, because Lorcan has a posse of CiL fanchildren. I don’t know if he knows it, but he does. I can give him names!) It was a good talk, too, and I’ll write about it when I’m not completely wiped.

(I’ll write about a lot of things when I’m not completely wiped. I haven’t bothered liveblogging this conference, partly because the conference wireless is one step above nonexistent, and partly because everybody is liveblogging this conference, so I’d only be carrying coals to Newcastle. I do have a couple of good rants brewing, though.)

Did find out a bit of news today that makes me happy. One of the things I complained to NARA/RLG about with regard to the whole “trusted digital repository” thing was that a lot of recommendations had to do with software platforms, so could we please just certify common platforms in use and save repository rats a metric ton of duplicate effort?

Well, so UIUC is doing exactly that with DSpace, comparing its functionality against the requirements in the checklist. I strongly approve of anything that saves me massive amounts of time and effort, so go UIUC!

22 Martii 2006

Apologies where due

I did not cover myself with glory today. If I covered myself with anything, it was closer to egg.

Turns out the rapport I noticed between the Fairfax Symphony concert’s cello soloist and its concertmistress was entirely genuine; I just jumped to an embarrassingly wrong conclusion about its source. They are, in fact, siblings—quite the musical family! I sincerely apologize to both for my mistake, and I thank the individual who called it to my attention.

This morning I duly hauled myself out of bed to go talk about weblogs. I then got off the bus too soon, followed a terribly misleading sign, and found myself entirely lost in the middle of office-park purgatory. By the time I sorted out where I was, I was a long way from where I needed to be with no hope of actually getting there on time.

I sent an Email Of Profuse Apology as soon as I got to the conference hotel and managed to find wireless, but I wouldn’t blame them one bit for being highly steamed.

Definitely not my most glorious day ever. The bibliobloggers’ dinner went well, at least, so I’m not a complete washout.