Caveat Lector

I owe Dr. Peter Sefton an apology for not addressing him as Dr. Sefton here. Mea culpa, and I’m sorry; the error was inadvertent and no disrespect was intended.

I should also make clear that I’m rooting for ICE-RS and Lemon8, and that my still-significant reservations about their prospects have nothing whatever to do with the people building them or the quality of their work (which I have no grounds to evaluate—save past experience with similar tools—as I haven’t tested either package yet).

No, this is a problem that lives at the intersection between people and computers. I don’t believe that authors will always not use styles; I know better. But that, to me, is not the question. The question is “will enough authors use these tools (whether based on styles or not), and will they use them adequately enough, to base an efficient publishing workflow on their work?”

I ain’t seen it happen yet, is all I’m sayin’. My jaundiced soul believes right to the bottom of its toes that markup is an editor’s tool, not an author’s, not to mention that a lot of players have different text-structure needs.

But that doesn’t mean that ICE-RS and Lemon8 are useless. It’s not as though editorial tools are perfect! (Back in the day I made a suggestion or two about how to get these tools right for authoring. I don’t think anybody listened to me then, and I doubt anyone will now. The point is, there are advances to be made, if anyone is willing to think hard enough about them and able to implement them.)

I find myself in an odd rhetorical position here. Under most circumstances, head-shakers with their eternal “Tried that. Didn’t work. Won’t work this time either,” bug the living you-know-what out of me. And here I am being one, and I don’t like it. Sometimes things happen when it’s their time to happen. Maybe now is the time for word-processing–based authoring tools for markup. Who am I to say it’s not?

Except…

The head-shakers are often wrong because something’s changed in their environment that makes the New Thing feasible where it wasn’t before. Roy Tennant made this point the other day in a different context. I guess where I go off the rails on author markup tools is that I don’t see what’s changed in author brains or in the value proposition for these tools such that authors are going to climb onboard en masse.

Maybe I’m wrong. I’d love to be.