Warning: fopen(/home/.lasher/yarinare/cavlec.yarinareth.net/wp-content/cache/) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Is a directory in /home/.lasher/yarinare/cavlec.yarinareth.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 96
Caveat Lector » 2006 » August

Dies Jovis, 17 Augusti 2006

Kudos to the deserving

I’ll happily add to the general kudos heaped upon Roy Tennant’s article about women in systems librarianship. It’s good stuff, it’s necessary stuff, and it took considerable cojones to publish.

I’d also be willing to put money on his really wanting to spike it. And that’s my fault, you see. I kicked up a big fat ruckus, bailed on a commitment, and generally treated good people badly over this whole feminism thing not long ago. I’m still comfortable with that, it being the best of a lot of lousy alternatives, but if Roy wants my head on a pike, I completely understand why.

And yet he didn’t spike the story. Go him.

I do think there are ways to attract young girls and the women they grow into to systems librarianship that have nothing to do with games. (Informing people who teach computers to children and ex-children of that basic fact will take work, however.) The indispensable Margolis and Fisher suggest that the lone-hacker-with-pizza image and the total absorption of some programmers with computers as machines is offputting to women, but adding a social dimension, especially a socially useful dimension, to the mix is highly attractive to them.

And what’s librarianship if not socially useful? This is why I keep saying that librarianship needs to connect its intake pipe to the exhaust(ed) pipe of women leaving comp sci programs. There’s talent there that we need, and we have a lot to offer.

That aside, though, I want to use Roy’s example to quiet the apprehension of a lot of guys who think it must be really hard to make those damfool women happy. It isn’t. I swear it isn’t, on an individual level. (On a societal level, it’s quite a bit harder.) The cardinal rule is, if you wouldn’t say it in front of a group of women consisting of your grandmother, your female boss (okay, imagine such a being if she doesn’t exist), your sister (ditto), and your significant other (if any)—maybe don’t say it at all, okay? Heck, if it helps, imagine irascible old me in that group.

And do like Roy. Swallow your anger and defensiveness when someone gores your ox on this; acknowledging frustration is the best way to defuse it. (I had “a woman” for “someone” in the previous sentence at first, but that traduces a number of men—not just Roy—that I’ve witnessed speak out courageously on this point.) Examine your assumptions, and don’t just handwave about how great it’d be if there were more women around—do something to make that happen.

Write an article. Cast a critical eye over the gender balance of the next tech conference you go to, and say something about it if it’s out of whack. Build a personal file of female speakers and writers, and make a point of recommending them. Link to female bloggers. There’s lots you can do, and none of it is hard.

Or, hey, you could just do like Roy does. That’s cool by me.

Dies Veneris, 18 Augusti 2006

Small victories

I happened to run into one of my repository early adopters today. She told me that she’d sent the SPARC Author Addendum to one of her publishers, and it had been accepted without comment.

I love my job. One faculty member at a time…

Dies Saturni, 19 Augusti 2006

Hummers!

My mother-in-law gave us a hummingbird feeder not long after we moved in. We didn’t think it would find fans, so we hadn’t bothered to fill and hang it.

This morning, though, it had taken the place of our cheap plastic pagoda-feeder. “I saw two hummingbirds!” said David excitedly. “Maybe they’ll come back.”

I was (very gratefully; last week was long and tiring, and I have work to do tomorrow) taking a nap in the early afternoon when David shook me. “Hummingbirds!” So I dragged myself out to my armchair, which I turned to face the window…

… and I didn’t even see where they came from, just that they whizzed past and one stopped to inspect the feeder. We don’t know what kind they are (though ruby-throated are the commonest around here, and isn’t that blog the coolest thing ever?), just that one is bigger than the other and they will both stop, hover, and dunk the end of a long curved beak into the sugar water.

So I’ve been reading about maintaining feeders, and basking in the glow, because, hummers! I’ll get a picture sometime if I can.

ETA: Definitely ruby-throated. We’ve zeroed in on a couple-three dead branches that they like to perch on. Male and female.

Dies Solis, 20 Augusti 2006

Dying and identity

My father’s father died long before I was born; I know no more of him than his name (which would have been mine if I hadn’t inconveniently been born the wrong gender) and the story of Grandma’s diamond which I now have and wear.

My other three grandparents are all gone now. I was only on the fringe of the ends of their lives.

In my grandfather’s case, that was really because I wasn’t needed. Grandpa had prostate cancer, chose not to treat it aggressively, lived quietly among his books and his genealogies and his investments (he was a county treasurer and freelance investment manager most of his career), went into hospice when he needed to, and was lucid to the day he died. I talked to him on the phone in hospice a few times. He was laconic about the state of his health. “Good days and bad days,” he said, and that was all he would say, having other things he preferred to talk about.

When he died, I felt that dying wasn’t so bad if one could manage it the way he did. He was never anything less than himself. I didn’t go to his funeral, though. I wanted to, but my mother said I shouldn’t in the tone of an Imperial Command. I felt strongly that wrangling over it would betray him and the way his death had decently and with dignity closed off his life, so I shut up and stayed away.

My father’s mother was overtaken by diabetes. She pleaded with her sons to live out her life in her own home, the home she’d lived in some fifty years. Her sons fought like gladiators over what to do with her—the option she actually asked for was never on the table—and she died in a nursing home, blind, confused, and helpless.

There were certainly discussions to be had about how best to care for her; I don’t mean to imply otherwise. But I was in on the email exchanges for a while, and let’s be clear that Grandma’s wishes were at the bottom of the concern pile for everyone. (”It would shorten her life,” they said of her express desire to stay at home. “It would be too expensive, poor value for money,” they said.) Grandma was a trophy, and the field of battle was who could most loudly and dramatically proclaim concern for her. It was a disgusting display of chest-pounding oneupsmanship, and when I visited Grandma in the place she eventually died in, she surely didn’t look any the better for their vaunted solicitude.

My mother’s mother, who died a week and a half ago, sank into one of the nastier sorts of dementia after a series of mini-strokes, her temper turning white-hot vicious. To make a long story short, my aunt cared for her after Grandpa’s death until Grandma’s temper escalating to physical abuse wore my aunt down enough to heed Grandma’s repeated requests to be institutionalized. (“She only says that because she thinks she’ll die,” my mother told me mournfully on several occasions. Well, and so? I thought.)

The change, it turns out, was not good for Grandma, who bit and kicked and spat at staff at the home until they had to sedate her for their own safety. She died in the body a few days later. If you ask me, which you didn’t, her mind and her self had died long before that. Grandma was the properest, most gracious lady you can imagine; she tried and failed to teach me manners and sewing throughout my childhood. She was also the paradigmatic church lady, generous with her time and effort, invariably kind to children, a credit and a help to her community.

Whatever was kicking and biting wasn’t my grandmother. I don’t know how else to put it. I don’t understand why changeling fairy tales are all about babes-in-arms; I think it more horrible that so many changelings are elders, that a solid and stable personality can not only vanish, but turn inside-out just in time for that to be the last memory that friends and children are left with.

My mother’s family is rather less contentious than my father’s, so I expected Grandma’s funeral to go smoothly. It didn’t. Whether because she felt that her siblings had deserted her with Grandma’s changeling, or out of plain ordinary vanity, my aunt shut my mother and my uncle out of the arrangements altogether, and my mother nearly came to (non-metaphorical) blows with her over it.

The most I can do, sitting here appalled and afraid, is try not to repeat the mistakes my parents and uncles and aunts made. I will listen to what my parents say they want, and let them govern their fate as much as I possibly can. I will take seriously Andy Clark’s contention that our physical surroundings are our cognitive scaffolding, and so I will think very hard before I change them for my parents. I will not force my parents to trade dignity and quality of life for mere quantity. I will do my level best to solve problems instead of creating them. I will remember that my parents quite properly reside at the center of their own lives; I will not relegate them to mere symbols in my own psychodrama.

I do not expect this to be straightforward.

Me, I am afraid again. Perhaps the reason my grandfather managed his own death while both my grandmothers could not is the gender difference. Men are permitted autonomy and self-direction, but everyone expects to take over for women. Men’s voices are heard and heeded; women are thought not to know what is best for them, are not trusted to make their own independent decisions about themselves. I hope this isn’t true, but it surely sounds plausible. I’m afraid to search the sociology literature, lest I find out I’m right.

I’m afraid of having my wishes disregarded and my dignity violated. I’m afraid of being robbed of my identity, becoming a changeling, losing the habits and abilities of mind that make me myself—and I’m even more afraid of being forced to live on as not-me. Hell doesn’t need an afterlife; plenty of scope in this one.

One small crumb of consolation is that I won’t have children to fight over me, smother me with misplaced kindness, and bungle my disposal. What I want is simple: recycle whatever’s recyclable—I am an organ donor, so all that’s in order—cremate the rest, and scatter it wherever because I’m past caring. And don’t spend a penny more than absolutely required. Money is for the living, not the dead.

My second grad-school advisor, who treated his grad students like the dirt under his fingernails, nonetheless managed the end of an emeritus professor’s life with true kindness and complete respect. The old man came in to do work whenever he wanted to. My advisor looked after his finances and got him to the doctor when he needed to go. Like my grandfather, the old man died lucidly and quietly, and had a quiet, dignified memorial.

Finding someone to do for me what my advisor did for him is all my hope for the end of my life.

Dies Lunae, 21 Augusti 2006

Five Weeks to a Social Library

I am, with five truly outstanding librarians, planning a five-week workshop for next February entitled “Five Weeks to a Social Library.” It’s all about the IM and the RSS and the blogs and the Flickr and the hey hey check out the social software!

For me, it’s also about putting together real services, useful services, on the cheap. We the planning committee are doing our level best not to spend money. All of us are donating labor, obviously, and a few of us are donating server space, bandwidth, and services. We’re relying heavily on open-source software and (currently-)free services.

Naturally, this means a salutary lesson in technology fallbacks. We’ve tried two Skype conference calls so far, and both times audio-quality problems sent us to IM chatrooms instead. That, to me, is a message worth sending—try things out, be flexible, have fallbacks, don’t panic. We get our work done just fine in the chatroom.

I’ll be shocked if we get through the entire five weeks with nothing breaking. That’s not a reflection on us; it’s a reflection on technology. My hope is that we set a good example for solving tech problems while keeping the focus on learning.

The benefit of all this tightwaddery is that we can offer this workshop to librarians who don’t have our travel and training budgets (or indeed any travel and training budget). For the first time, I’m smiling when I think about my service-to-the-profession obligation. Sharing what I know with people who want to know it irrespective of means is what service ought to be about.

Without further ado, our CFP:


Call For Presenters: Five Weeks to a Social Library

CFP: Five Weeks to a Social Library
Location: Online
Dates: February 12 - March 17, 2007
CFP Deadline: September 22, 2006

We are pleased to present Five Weeks to a Social Library , the first free, grassroots, completely online course devoted to teaching librarians about social software and how to use it in their libraries. The course was developed to provide a free, comprehensive, and social online learning opportunity for librarians who do not otherwise have access to conferences or continuing education and who would benefit greatly from learning about social software. The course will take place in Drupal and on a MediaWiki installation, and will also involve a variety of other popular social software tools. The course will make use of synchronous components, with one or two weekly Webcasts and many IM chat sessions being made available to students each week. The course will culminate in each student developing a proposal for implementing a specific social software tool in their library.

The course will take place between February 12 and March 17 and will be limited to forty participants. However, course content will be freely viewable to interested parties and all live Webcasts will be archived for later viewing.

We are currently welcoming proposals for live presentations and course content on the following topics:

  • Blogs
  • RSS
  • Wikis
  • Social Networking Software and SecondLife
  • Flickr
  • Social Bookmarking Software
  • Selling Social Software @ Your Library (no live Webcasts on this topic)

We want the presentations to be as practical and useful to as wide a library-related audience as possible. Preference will be given to presentations that 1) are very “nuts-and-bolts” or 2) describe a successful use of the technology that could be replicated in different types of libraries.

We are looking for presentations in the following formats:

  • Webcast – a one-hour live online Webcast that will be archived.
  • Screencast/Vodcast – no more than 30 minutes (please note: most commercial screencasting software offer a 30-day free trial).
  • Podcast – we welcome proposals for podcast presentations, podcast interviews with innovators in the field or podcast discussions between innovators in the field.
  • Text presentations – we will accept a very limited number of text presentations, but we greatly prefer presentations that incorporate audio and video.

In addition to developing a presentation, presenters must also make themselves available via AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) for questions from students for one-hour during the week their presentation is shown.

All presentations will be made available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

Format of Proposal: 250 – 500 words, written. Proposals are a way for the review team to assess your contribution quickly. Please do not submit full presentations.

Proposals should include the following:

  • Full name of presenter
  • E-mail address of presenter
  • Web-site and/or blog URL of presenter
  • IM screenname(s)
  • Institutional affiliation
  • Brief biographical information (under 150 words)
  • Include same personal information as above for any additional presenters after the lead presenter (if applicable)
  • Presentation title
  • Format(s) you are willing to present in (if you are flexible about the format you are willing to present in, please note that)
  • Presentation Abstract (250 – 500 words)

Proposals must be submitted by September 22, 2006 via e-mail to sociallibrary@gmail.com . Any questions about the CFP process can be addressed to the Planning Committee at sociallibrary@gmail.com.

Proposal Review: Proposals will be reviewed by the planning committee.

Planning Committee:

  • Michelle Boule
  • Karen Coombs
  • Amanda Etches-Johnson
  • Meredith Farkas
  • Ellyssa Kroski
  • Dorothea Salo

Key Dates:

  • Deadline for Proposals: Friday, September 22, 2006.
  • Notification of Acceptance: October 1, 2006.

Dies Martis, 22 Augusti 2006

Ups and downs

Sometimes things just don’t work. Hazard of being in this business. But sometimes things that shouldn’t work do.

I tied a how-to-deposit tutorial to the local technology-training effort, since that is well-publicized and I don’t turn down free publicity. Unfortunately, it seems that the audience for tech training is not my audience, because my first tute this morning turned up precisely zero faculty. (Though I did have a nice chat with a new hire in special collections.) Eh, well, it happens—and at least I have the materials ready for other tutorials.

I also turned up for the new-faculty orientation this afternoon, hoping to hook a fish or two. I did not expect to be able to hand the repository’s brag sheet to the Vice-President for Research and Economic Development—but I’m not at all sorry for the opportunity!

Another tutorial scheduled for Friday. We’ll see how it goes.

Dies Mercurii, 23 Augusti 2006

Second-order effects

Dominoes are falling in the UK; funder after funder has announced that funded research must be open-access. Kudos to Wellcome Trust for being first.

I’m currently involved in a grant process locally, the first time I’ve ever worked on a grant. A key part of the process, it appears, is monkey-see-monkey-do, working out what previous grantees said and did that might have won favor with grant examiners.

As more funders insist on open access, it seems not improbable that grant seekers will consider open publication venues and self-archiving a way to win brownie points on future grant applications. I expect this to have only a modest positive effect at best… but anything positive is good news.

Funders could accelerate the effect, of course, by explicitly listing open access to previous research among the factors they weight when deciding on grants.

Hummer Wars

A long time ago, on a balcony far, far away… (cue pompous brass fanfare) HUMMER WARS.

Them little suckers is territorial as all get-out. A friend warned me about that on LiveJournal; now we know she’s right.

We have at least three hummers back there; I just saw two trying to fake out the third, who has our feeder staked out as his personal territory. All your sugar-water are belong to ME, he says. Which is silly, because all three of them combined couldn’t possibly empty it before we have to dump and clean it anyway, but the ways of hummers are unaccountable.

Watching Mr. 0wnz0r standing sentinel (well, perching sentinel) in his jaunty green weskit on the tree a little way from our feeder, David asked me quizzically, “Are you sure that red isn’t the blood of his enemies?”

No. Honestly? No. I’m not. Though it’s darn shiny blood, if it is blood.

It’s nice to come home and watch hummingbirds swooping about like superheroes, though. I hauled twenty-some-odd pounds of interlibrary-loaned Rg Veda concordance home tonight (note to dissertators at a distance: it is advantageous to marry an academic librarian), and now I’m not even grouchy about it.

Dies Jovis, 24 Augusti 2006

Metadata zombie

I spent the day massaging metadata in the repository, and writing up a FAQ in hopes of doing less metadata-massaging in the future.

I am forcibly reminded why I did not go into cataloguing. This stuff is eating my brain, and I’m nowhere near done yet. (Finished basic author cleanup, though when I have round tuits I’m going to do authority searches on the list. Wading through subjects.) And? The Library of Congress’s authority search runs on sessions, lets me know every single time I’ve timed out, and is all clicky-clicky and unclear with the authorized and non-authorized headings. I hate that.

On the plus side, though, I seem to have landed my first invitation to speak professionally. (Um, in my new profession. I have a couple-three invitations to my credit from my conversion-peasant days.) Because I’m paranoid about announcing these things until they are firmly nailed down, no details at present—but I’m excited!

Paying dues for the Cool Job

I happened by Timothy Burke’s place and found this post with which I wholeheartedly agree. Go read it. I’ll wait.

As is widely known, I’m an irritable sort, but very little irritates me more than watching people go mindlessly off to graduate school and end up no more fitted for the job market than when they entered, no matter whether they graduate or wash out. I’m not even all that concerned about skills; it’s the sense of entitlement and the cluelessness that make me climb walls. This is the trap New Librarian was in. I wish Dr. Burke had written that post years ago, I do.

Personally, I’ve used Routes 1, 2, and 4. Route 3 isn’t quite my style (and Dr. Burke is right that if it’s not your style, don’t try to fake it), and nothing I’ve ever done has been bad enough to even approach Route 5.

I got yet another email about the grad-school story from a matriculating graduate student who said jubilantly, “Now I don’t feel stupid for having a backup plan!” Seems her adviser had pooh-poohed the effort of creating one.

If I could get to that adviser and fire him or her out on his/her unethical butt, I would so very, very do that. It is not cool to tell impressionable youngsters that Grad School Is All You Need, because that is a flat lie. It is cool to be realistic, as Dr. Burke and some other recent email correspondents from faculty ranks have been.

« Previous PageNext Page »
270c motorola ringtone timeportnextel motorola i530 ringtoneslsu ringtones